Save 5% at Vevor and Support Canadian Poncho!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Was a hood tach available as dealer installed item on B Body Poncho?


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 303
Date:
Was a hood tach available as dealer installed item on B Body Poncho?


I see the accessory guide for 1967 lists hood tach as US Pontiac only. Is there any evidence (paper work) to suggest that 1967-1969 B Body Ponchos could have been bought new off the lot with a hood tach? I don't plan to put one on my 67 convertible, but I'd still like to know, if anyone knows for sure one way or the other.

Thank you.



__________________


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 50244
Date:

When you say bought off the lot with a hood tach, you are meaning a factory installation on a Canadian Pontiac, or are you meaning as an accessory, dealer installed on a Canadian Pontiac.

My unprofessional opinion is no to factory, yes to a dealer accessory. Technically you could pay the dealer to install Hooker headers on your new car before you take it off the lot and that would qualify as a dealer installed accessory so pretty much the sky is the limit on those.

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 303
Date:

Thanks Carl. I guess I mean dealer installed. I believe there were no "factory" hood tachs. Is there any proof that any were installed by a dealership? I see some B Body Ponchos with hood tachs here and there and wonder if that is "correct". To me, if I could have walked into a CDN  Pontiac dealership in 1968 and bought a brand new 2+2 with a hood tach that the dealer installed- either at my request, or prior to any customer request, then that tach would be correct to the car and any 68 2+2 could be restored "correctly" with a hood tach. If you could only get a hood tach in a 68 2+2 by buying it after the fact and installing it like you would an aftermarket wing or spoiler or set of mag wheels, then that would not be correct in my opinion. I could see dealers adding a tach of some kind on these cars because they didn't have available in dash tachs. I also think it would be cool if hood tachs could be considered correct for 1967-69 B Body Ponchos. SS427 Impalas had the special domed hoods in 67/68, and if a hood tach were correct for a big block 2+2, then that would be another "unique" feature of our Ponchos that even the SS427 crowd couldn't equal. I just think that would be kinda "neat". However, when I see the hood tachs on the B Body Ponchos, it doesn't look natural to me. My opinion could change if I could prove a hood tach to be correct. 



-- Edited by Mondo Poncho on Wednesday 25th of November 2015 02:37:04 PM

__________________


Uber Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3678
Date:

My '70.... Not within the '67-'69 range but.......... To "tick" the specific box when ordering? I think not.... To add when the car arrived at the dealer? I'd say so.... Or, someone like me? Absolutely! (lolol)

100_1209.jpg

 

100_1218.jpg





-- Edited by 67Poncho on Wednesday 25th of November 2015 08:58:00 AM

Attachments
__________________

Vincent Jr.



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4965
Date:

Not optional from the factory for Canadian Pontiacs. The accessory book shows them as being for 250-260 series Pontiacs, which is code for saying U.S. Pontiacs. Canadian Pontiacs were 750-760 series.

Personally I think a proper hood tach would look right at home on a Canadian 67 Pontiac 2+2. They were using hood tachs on the 2+2 in the States, and the Canadian 2+2 looked so much like the U.S version that year.  If I wanted a tach I don't think I would hesitate to put one of those hood tachs on. The horizontal speedo cluster doesn't lend itself well to a factory tachometer, and a strap-on one on the steering column, although functional and easily removable, just shouts universal aftermarket stuff on this car.

The 68 U.S. Big Pontiac brochure shows a neat 2-page spread of a maroon 428 4-speed Ventura convertible with a hood tachometer.



__________________

67 Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe, Oshawa-built 250 PG never disturbed.

In garage, 296 cid inline six & TH350...

Cam, Toronto.


I don't judge a man by how far he's fallen, but by how far back he bounces - Patton



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 20744
Date:

CdnGMfan wrote:

Personally I think a proper hood tach would look right at home on a Canadian 67 Pontiac 2+2. They were using hood tachs on the 2+2 in the States, and the Canadian 2+2 looked so much like the U.S version that year.  If I wanted a tach I don't think I would hesitate to put one of those hood tachs on. The horizontal speedo cluster doesn't lend itself well to a factory tachometer, and a strap-on one on the steering column, although functional and easily removable, just shouts universal aftermarket stuff on this car.


 Agreed.



__________________

Prince Edward Island

'64 Parisienne CS "barn find" - last on the road in '86 ... Owner Protection Plan booklet, original paint, original near-mint aqua interior, original aqua GM floor mats, original 283, factory posi, and original rust.



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1914
Date:

I see a tach listed as optional in the 1968 B body C.P. sales brochure, but have never seen one.

I always assumed it was somewhere around the dash or console.

Anyone ever see a 1968 B body Canadian Pontiac with any kind of factory tach??

Thanks
Randy

__________________

Sherwood Park
Alberta, Canada

 

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 303
Date:

Thanks for the info and opinions. I think the hood tach look very cool and they are a natural fit for our cars that didn't come with a tach. I would like to know if there is any hard evidence of dealer installed units, like maybe a purchase document of some kind. I can see why these hood tachs were not offered up here. I read somewhere that early versions leaked and fogged up. The Northern climate and the Canadian tendency at the time to be frugal when it came to options probably made it an easy decision- not to offer it. Still, I think they look awesome on a big car and really amp up the sport factor. I think I'd go for one if it fit my definition of "correct". Not that I necessarily have even decided yet exactly how correct is correct enough, if you know what I mean. I just wonder- would putting a hood tach on be equal to putting 8 lug wheels on a CDN Pontiac? Maybe it looks great and maybe a dealer could find a way to make it happen (bolt pattern issues? maybe a bad example), but were people really driving Parisienne 2+2's new off the lot that way? I don't think so. However I suspect that some people perhaps did drive a few of the 67-70 B Body Ponchos off the lot with hood tach installed. Any other opinions on that? Any evidence out there either way?

__________________


Uber Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3678
Date:

73SC wrote:
Mondo Poncho wrote:

Thanks for the info and opinions. I think the hood tach look very cool and they are a natural fit for our cars that didn't come with a tach. I would like to know if there is any hard evidence of dealer installed units, like maybe a purchase document of some kind. I can see why these hood tachs were not offered up here. I read somewhere that early versions leaked and fogged up. The Northern climate and the Canadian tendency at the time to be frugal when it came to options probably made it an easy decision- not to offer it. Still, I think they look awesome on a big car and really amp up the sport factor. I think I'd go for one if it fit my definition of "correct". Not that I necessarily have even decided yet exactly how correct is correct enough, if you know what I mean. I just wonder- would putting a hood tach on be equal to putting 8 lug wheels on a CDN Pontiac? Maybe it looks great and maybe a dealer could find a way to make it happen (bolt pattern issues? maybe a bad example), but were people really driving Parisienne 2+2's new off the lot that way? I don't think so. However I suspect that some people perhaps did drive a few of the 67-70 B Body Ponchos off the lot with hood tach installed. Any other opinions on that? Any evidence out there either way?


 Do you want one ? 


I may! 



__________________

Vincent Jr.



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4771
Date:

the more i look at it the more i want one myself.

__________________

sTevE

55 GMC, 70 Pontiac 2+2 rag



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 20261
Date:

Stephenzone wrote:

the more i look at it the more i want one myself.


 Friday, I'll try and have one for you, I lent mine out, just have to get it back. I may have two so everyone can be happy, strong on the word MAY however.



-- Edited by 73SC on Wednesday 25th of November 2015 04:27:31 PM

__________________

Ray White, Toronto ON

Formerly - The one and only 1973 LeMans 454 "Astro-Jet"

Built March 9, 1973 - Oshawa ON

1993 Corvette Convertible LT 1

Built January 10, 1993 - Bowling Green Kentucky 

 




Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 303
Date:

Are they hard to find? If so, and you have a nice correct piece- I would be interested. At first, I thought the hood tach was the way to go. When I found out it wasn't an available accessory option for CDN Pontiac, I changed my mind. Now these comments have me thinking how nice it would be to have one again! The lack of a tach in my 4 speed car is really a shame though I will say! I think I would go for the taller early edition correct for 1967 if I understand things right. Those tachs sure look sweet on the big US cars!!! I just wouldn't want to bastardize a rare car. I already plan to go to bigger 15x8 Rally wheels, radial tires and disc brakes. Probably will go with Hurst shifter mated to stock Muncie handle. Also ignition would be a consideration if I'm looking at a tach? I may go with better sway bars front and back. Maybe a 1969 quick ratio steering box. Engine will be stock looking top to bottom. But the car will have some bolt on mods. So why not a hood tach? May I ask the purists what they might think?

__________________
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 20261
Date:

Mondo Poncho wrote:

Are they hard to find? If so, and you have a nice correct piece-

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 That hurts, look at my items for sale they are all nice, pure quality from Big Ray, that's enough to turn me into The Tach Nazi....as in No Tach for You!  Yes in Canada they are hard to find, go to Carlisle and you'll find them, walk Ancaster  every weekend its held and you'll never see one. 

 



__________________

Ray White, Toronto ON

Formerly - The one and only 1973 LeMans 454 "Astro-Jet"

Built March 9, 1973 - Oshawa ON

1993 Corvette Convertible LT 1

Built January 10, 1993 - Bowling Green Kentucky 

 




Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4965
Date:

From the U.S. 1967 Pontiac High Performance Models brochure:

 

1967_perfcat_pgs18-19.jpg

It would look right at home if you used the right tach and placed it properly on the hood.



Attachments
__________________

67 Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe, Oshawa-built 250 PG never disturbed.

In garage, 296 cid inline six & TH350...

Cam, Toronto.


I don't judge a man by how far he's fallen, but by how far back he bounces - Patton



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7792
Date:

73SC wrote:
Stephenzone wrote:

the more i look at it the more i want one myself.


 Friday, I'll try and have one for you, I lent mine out, just have to get it back. I may have two so everyone can be happy, strong on the word MAY however.



-- Edited by 73SC on Wednesday 25th of November 2015 04:27:31 PM


Keep in mind the hood tach's are a bit different each year.  Also, when mounting on a 1970 B body they need to sit more towards the center of the hood, as putting them directly in line with the steering column can't be done because of the body lines of the hood. 



__________________
70 2+2 convertible
70 2+2 hardtop
70 Parisienne hardtop

 

 



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 303
Date:

Was that some kind of a set up? I fail to see how my comments offend. Forgive my ignorance. I will do just fine without. 



__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7183
Date:

Hey Mondo... I don't think you offended anyone... 

 

I'd love to,see the monster your building... Hood tach and ALL  ....



__________________

later...rog

AADD supporting member !!
I'm a collector...not a builder!!Located in sunny central Saskatchewan at the lakehead!
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 281
Date:

Mondo Poncho wrote:

Are they hard to find? If so, and you have a nice correct piece- I would be interested. At first, I thought the hood tach was the way to go. When I found out it wasn't an available accessory option for CDN Pontiac, I changed my mind. Now these comments have me thinking how nice it would be to have one again! The lack of a tach in my 4 speed car is really a shame though I will say! I think I would go for the taller early edition correct for 1967 if I understand things right. Those tachs sure look sweet on the big US cars!!! I just wouldn't want to bastardize a rare car. I already plan to go to bigger 15x8 Rally wheels, radial tires and disc brakes. Probably will go with Hurst shifter mated to stock Muncie handle. Also ignition would be a consideration if I'm looking at a tach? I may go with better sway bars front and back. Maybe a 1969 quick ratio steering box. Engine will be stock looking top to bottom. But the car will have some bolt on mods. So why not a hood tach? May I ask the purists what they might think?


 Try APE, Ames Performance Engineering. www.amesperf.com They are a US Pontiac specialist.  They have lots of them.

Have considered one for my '68. Just hate the thought of butchering my hood.

Fred



__________________


Uber Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3678
Date:

seventy2plus2 wrote:

 


Keep in mind the hood tach's are a bit different each year.  Also, when mounting on a 1970 B body they need to sit more towards the center of the hood, as putting them directly in line with the steering column can't be done because of the body lines of the hood. 


 More so than not, the under ribbings of the hood is the deciding factor....



__________________

Vincent Jr.



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 50244
Date:

Mondo, I want to play the evil guy here. However, everyone who reads this needs to realize this will just be my personal opinion, just like colours are.

I feel that putting a hood tach on a Canadian Pontiac takes away some of the "Canadian" from the Canadian car. Those tachs pretty much scream US model, at least in my mind. They just weren't seen in Canada. If it was me, I would want to keep the car looking 100% authentic Canadian, preserving it's heritage.

My two cents..... (in Canadian funds!)

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 20744
Date:

Carl Stevenson wrote:

Mondo, I want to play the evil guy here. However, everyone who reads this needs to realize this will just be my personal opinion, just like colours are.

I feel that putting a hood tach on a Canadian Pontiac takes away some of the "Canadian" from the Canadian car. Those tachs pretty much scream US model, at least in my mind. They just weren't seen in Canada. If it was me, I would want to keep the car looking 100% authentic Canadian, preserving it's heritage.

My two cents..... (in Canadian funds!)


 Bwwwwwah ah ah devilish.gif ... evil guy!



__________________

Prince Edward Island

'64 Parisienne CS "barn find" - last on the road in '86 ... Owner Protection Plan booklet, original paint, original near-mint aqua interior, original aqua GM floor mats, original 283, factory posi, and original rust.



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 303
Date:

Hi Carl. As much as I like the look, I agree with you. Still lots of time to change my mind over and over- but I don't think I will go the hood tach route for my convertible. But don't hold me to that!!

__________________
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4897
Date:

Just curious as I have a couple or three 67's. If you wanted a tach on one of those in Canada what were your options? 

 From what I've read so far, I don't think there was an RPO for 67 so was it a Dealer installed accessory only? If so what did it look like? The kneeknocker?

 



__________________

ken from northern Alberta

38 Willys pickup electric

39 Buick (327 with 700 r4)

66 Beaumont 4 door hardtop

69 Chevy CST pickup

1976 GMC 23'  motorhome

1994 Impala SS 

1968 Citroen Fourgonnette (Yeah Carl!)



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 303
Date:

I'm relatively new at this but my research so far suggests that the steering column mounted tach in the 67 accessories catalog was the recommended way to get a tachometer for  B Body CDN Pontiac. I don't have the catalog handy at this moment but I think it is posted on this site. Hood tachs specified for US. Pontiac. The thing that looks like a horizontal row of LED lights was specified for Chevrolet. Looked to me like just the column mount tach was a "correct" accessory for us. Too bad for me. I need the leg room. 



-- Edited by Mondo Poncho on Thursday 26th of November 2015 03:23:09 PM

__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4965
Date:

I agree with not butchering an old Pontiac to throw just any old option onto the car just because. Especially a Canadian version.

The way I look at it though is if I ordered the car new with a big block & 4-speed, I would have seriously considered putting the hood tach on the car when new. If the car was an automatic or not performance oriented I don't think I would use a hood tach.



__________________

67 Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe, Oshawa-built 250 PG never disturbed.

In garage, 296 cid inline six & TH350...

Cam, Toronto.


I don't judge a man by how far he's fallen, but by how far back he bounces - Patton

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.