Save 5% at Vevor and Support Canadian Poncho!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Difference between a convertible and a 2+2 convertible


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 49
Date:
Difference between a convertible and a 2+2 convertible


I guess the subject says it all, what the heck is the difference? Thanks



__________________

Sherwood Park, Alberta



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7789
Date:

The basic difference is that the 2+2's had bucket seats, center console and ralley wheels.  

The 2+2 has a sporty overtone to it, as there were Mustang 2+2's, Ferrari 2+2's and even Monza 2+2's in the 70's.  2+2 means 2 people in the front, 2 in the back, even though you may have 3 sets of seat belts in the back seat.



__________________
70 2+2 convertible
70 2+2 hardtop
70 Parisienne hardtop

 

 

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7789
Date:

Also, in 1968, the 2+2's had the Impala SS interior.



__________________
70 2+2 convertible
70 2+2 hardtop
70 Parisienne hardtop

 

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1769
Date:

bradkerbick wrote:

I guess the subject says it all, what the heck is the difference? Thanks


 Next time you come to cruise night and I'm there we'll park side by each and compare. 



__________________

'68 Parisienne 2+2 Convertible Matador Red (Resale Red but not for sale).



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 49
Date:

JC2+2 wrote:
bradkerbick wrote:

I guess the subject says it all, what the heck is the difference? Thanks


 Next time you come to cruise night and I'm there we'll park side by each and compare. 


 Sounds great, unfortunately I work this coming Tuesday



__________________

Sherwood Park, Alberta

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.