I suspect a US magazine would feel there wouldn't be enough interest in a car that wasn't available there. That's why I started this forum as back in 2008 there was little to no online information on these cars. 

Yes , I believe there is bias and perhaps a little ignorance down south, when it comes to Canadian produced Pontiacs. However , in the same breath , I'm probably bias at car shows when i walk by imports ( or other models I'm not familiar with ) . I guess it is just human nature .
Good news though , The National Impala Association is now recognizing the Canadian built Pontiac 2+2's , as they realize the are the same as Chevrolet ( powertrains , frames etc..) . Perhaps over time , Canadian Pontiac's will be more widely accepted .

I  filled out one of those "how are we doing?" surveys about 6 or 8 months ago from Hagerty insurance.

I proceeded to give them crap ratings on on a number of things, and that lead to getting another questionaire last fall from

them asking in detail why I felt  they did poorly. My major beef  was about one of their so called "perks' for having Hagerty insurance.

They have this on line Car  Valuation feature that I called out as useless to Canadian drivers with Canadian built cars.

https://www.hagerty.ca/apps/valuationtools/search/auto/Pontiac

This "feature" isn't for Canadians who own those distinctly different cars built here and are not like their American counterparts.

I told them if they are doing business in Canada and are offering a Car Valuation then have it for all cars that we drive and

collect. That questionaire was about two months ago and I haven't  gotten a response yet.....(and I doubt if I will)

If everyone who has Hagerty collector car insurance tells them what I did, maybe we could get them to

actually get this valuation done for the Canadian cars collected on this side of the border. There are many,many distinct cars built here that should be recognized.

This American company needs to realize we are not all driving American and Foreign cars or that we have our own vehicles that we are proud to own.

-G

-- Edited by Greaser on Thursday 14th of January 2021 10:59:57 PM

Good point about Hagerty's valuation tool. There's also a "Can't find your vehicle?" link on the valuation tool. I suggest we all submit a Canadian Pontiac, Acadian or Beaumont model. I just did.

4SPEED427 wrote:

---

Some of you know I owned Kevin's car for about 9 years in the '80s. In 1986 I took that car to North Carolina to the Pontiac convention. People there were very gracious and asked a lot of questions about the car. There were no negative comments. I spent an incredible few days at that convention explaining to guys about Canadian Pontiacs and really enjoyed it. However, when I'm  reading on the US Pontiac forums there is often a lot of negative talk about our "Chevy chassis" Canadian pontiacs. I know exactly what Kevin is referring to here. Many of the US model owners would not take the time to look at a Canadian Pontiac. I feel that's very unfortunate because in my mind they are a very important part of Pontiac history.

A different year I took my Acadian to the Pontiac convention. When I pulled up to the hotel to register someone ran up to me and told me I wasn't in the right place! I very politely explained that this was a car sold at Canadian Pontiac dealerships.

---

 Interesting.  I can't imagine why there would be a negative reaction to what amounts to the most rare and unique Pontiacs out there, but I always find that aspect of the hobby to be a little strange anyhow.  From what you're saying it seems like it's more about the fact that they aren't "pure" Pontiacs vs merely being Canadian.

And... you took an Acadian to a Pontiac convention, Carl?  What were you thinking?    

Hi Kevin,

It is probably true that most US publications tend to favor American made cars.  And the point about the engine distinction is probably one of the reasons why.  My perspective is more balanced.  When I bought my Beaumont I was a dyed in the wool Chevy man.  One of the reasons I bought my Pontiac was because of the engine.  Note that I said Pontiac.  I'm not one of those who think that a Beaumont isn't a Pontiac.  In my view a Beaumont is a Canadian Pontiac that uses Chevrolet mechanicals.  The best of both worlds.

All the best,

Bob

you acadian pontiac guys are getting outa hand here beaumont pontiacs are canadian

As a border straddler all my life who is a big fan of American Pontiac but who also has a Canadian one I think I can add some interesting input...

First, is that it is normal that the general public outside of Canada will have a limited interest in Canadian cars simply because Canada is a very small market. To many Americans their interest in a Canadian only model would be the same as for say Mexico spec chevy. In fairness, how many of us here have any interest in that same Latin American market Chevy?

Second, it is the hard to pigeon hole the nature of Canadian Ponchos, are they really Pontiac's with Chevy engines or chevies with Pontiac styling? I think they are more the latter. This is obvious with Acadians and Beaumonts which are obviously chevies with only slighlt changed grilles and emblems (and a Pontiac dashpad on Beaumonts) to distinguish them. Even the fullsize Canadian Ponchos are more Chevy than Pontiac in that the only Pontiac elements are some body panels, dashboard and trim, every single mechanical component from the drivetrain to suspension, frame right to windshield wipers are pure Chevrolet.

Other elements are at play too, Pontiac fans have always had that inferiority complex versus giant Chevrolet (like Canadians have to the US in general) which is even worse now since Pontiac got chopped. This is countered by Pontiac being one ladder rung up from Chevrolet in terms of price and "prestige". So a car made to look like a Pontiac but that is really a Chevrolet mechanically can obviously give off that undesirable scent of a "poseur".

Lastly part of the partisan appeal of 60's car collectors is that back then each division was a "real" car with it's own engine, not just brand engineered like they became in the 80's to now so the fact that Canadian Poncho's are brand engineered by definition they lack that "real" label that is important to most 60's GM fans.

Of course there is a totally different way to look at this, which I suspect exactly how most of the people on this site view it... Canadian Poncho appeal comes from few major points; one is the nationalistic appeal of it being a unique Canadian car, something we never had much of here! Second is the uniqueness of these cars and their rarity (Canadian market is a small one to begin with and Canadian weather savaged the survival rate). Lastly you get all the advantages of having a Chevrolet (huge variety of parts availability at lowest cost possible plus bulletproof Chevy engineering) without the commonness of having just another chevelle or impala.

I've come to realize in my years that you have to worry a lot less about what other people think about us and instead just enjoy what we enjoy.

North wrote:

---

As a border straddler all my life who is a big fan of American Pontiac but who also has a Canadian one I think I can add some interesting input...

First, is that it is normal that the general public outside of Canada will have a limited interest in Canadian cars simply because Canada is a very small market. To many Americans their interest in a Canadian only model would be the same as for say Mexico spec chevy. In fairness, how many of us here have any interest in that same Latin American market Chevy?

Second, it is the hard to pigeon hole the nature of Canadian Ponchos, are they really Pontiac's with Chevy engines or chevies with Pontiac styling? I think they are more the latter. This is obvious with Acadians and Beaumonts which are obviously chevies with only slighlt changed grilles and emblems (and a Pontiac dashpad on Beaumonts) to distinguish them. Even the fullsize Canadian Ponchos are more Chevy than Pontiac in that the only Pontiac elements are some body panels, dashboard and trim, every single mechanical component from the drivetrain to suspension, frame right to windshield wipers are pure Chevrolet.

Other elements are at play too, Pontiac fans have always had that inferiority complex versus giant Chevrolet (like Canadians have to the US in general) which is even worse now since Pontiac got chopped. This is countered by Pontiac being one ladder rung up from Chevrolet in terms of price and "prestige". So a car made to look like a Pontiac but that is really a Chevrolet mechanically can obviously give off that undesirable scent of a "poseur".

Lastly part of the partisan appeal of 60's car collectors is that back then each division was a "real" car with it's own engine, not just brand engineered like they became in the 80's to now so the fact that Canadian Poncho's are brand engineered by definition they lack that "real" label that is important to most 60's GM fans.

Of course there is a totally different way to look at this, which I suspect exactly how most of the people on this site view it... Canadian Poncho appeal comes from few major points; one is the nationalistic appeal of it being a unique Canadian car, something we never had much of here! Second is the uniqueness of these cars and their rarity (Canadian market is a small one to begin with and Canadian weather savaged the survival rate). Lastly you get all the advantages of having a Chevrolet (huge variety of parts availability at lowest cost possible plus bulletproof Chevy engineering) without the commonness of having just another chevelle or impala.

I've come to realize in my years that you have to worry a lot less about what other people think about us and instead just enjoy what we enjoy.

---

 Well said, especially the last sentence.

jduffett wrote:

---

I think this is probably the key to it. If you're fiercely protective of the identity of your "real" Pontiac, you're probably pretty suspicious of a Canadian car that looks like the precursor to the badge-engineered car and death of the "real" Pontiacs. I think that is sort of understandable, though it is unfortunate that the end result is a lack of respect for a whole host of unique cars.

My Impala is a 16437 (V8 Impala 2-dr coupe) with A51 bucket seat option. It is equipped as an SS in every way, and to my knowledge, was from the factory. As far as I've been able to gather, that's just how an Impala SS was ordered/built in Canada, but I think there's still a few crusty guys in the US who would turn their noses up at it because it doesn't have a 16837 on the cowl tag. Which is utter foolishness if you ask me, considering the SS is really just a trim package and was available in just about any configuration!

---

 You don't have the GM documents for your car? That would tell the story. I never say never but I've never (!) seen a regular 66 Impala with factory buckets. Chevelle yes but not in the Novas or Impalas.

4SPEED427 wrote:

---

 You don't have the GM documents for your car? That would tell the story. I never say never but I've never (!) seen a regular 66 Impala with factory buckets. Chevelle yes but not in the Novas or Impalas.

---

No I don't. My belief is that it is a "true" SS, despite the style number. I can't recall where I read it, but I do recall reading somewhere that for some other Canadian GM models (probably A-bodies?) in the same time frame SS cars didn't get a unique style number like US cars did. Based on the way my cowl tag decodes, and no evidence to my eye or from my knowledge of the car's history that somebody went through the effort to make an SS clone, I think this must have applied for Impalas too.

Style 16437 1-3-7 = (16437) Impala 2 door coupe V8 (1) 1^st shift (3) March (7) 7^th

Body No. 149291 = Body Number

Paint C = Ermine White

Trim 873 = Impala SuperSport Bucket Seats, red

A51 M35  U80 = (A51) Seat, Frt Bkt Pass, Driver (M35) Powerglide Automatic Transmission (U80) Speaker System, RR

 

Canadian Poncho wrote:

---

 GM Vintage Vehicle Services can verify how your car was built.

https://www.vintagevehicleservices.com/

---

Thanks for that. I assume they charge for that service?

 

Anyway, didn't mean to derail the thread... Just pointing out another way some Canadian GM idiosyncrasies sometimes aren't really recognized south of the border!

jduffett wrote:

---

4SPEED427 wrote:

---

 You don't have the GM documents for your car? That would tell the story. I never say never but I've never (!) seen a regular 66 Impala with factory buckets. Chevelle yes but not in the Novas or Impalas.

---

No I don't. My belief is that it is a "true" SS, despite the style number. I can't recall where I read it, but I do recall reading somewhere that for some other Canadian GM models (probably A-bodies?) in the same time frame SS cars didn't get a unique style number like US cars did. Based on the way my cowl tag decodes, and no evidence to my eye or from my knowledge of the car's history that somebody went through the effort to make an SS clone, I think this must have applied for Impalas too.

Style 16437 1-3-7 = (16437) Impala 2 door coupe V8 (1) 1^st shift (3) March (7) 7^th

Body No. 149291 = Body Number

Paint C = Ermine White

Trim 873 = Impala SuperSport Bucket Seats, red

A51 M35  U80 = (A51) Seat, Frt Bkt Pass, Driver (M35) Powerglide Automatic Transmission (U80) Speaker System, RR

 

---

 You HAVE to get your documents! If they come back as a 16437 with A51, you have a rare car!