BEAUMONT production numbers

68sd · Canadian Poncho Superstar!

BEAUMONT production numbers

65post · Poncho Master!

RE: beaumont body styles

Stephenzone · Canadian Poncho Superstar!

the race is on. i have no beaumont info. i sure would like to know how many 67 beaumont wagon there was after growing up with dads wagon and never seeing another one.

beaumontwagon · Guru

Okay some other #s I got ,after talking to beaumontguru,including my freshly decoded 65 wagon. model 73637-585 made.73537-722 made.73535-151 made.73737-380 made.Correct me if I'm wrong Dave. Anyone else have some input?

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

beaumontwagon wrote:

Okay some other #s I got ,after talking to beaumontguru,including my freshly decoded 65 wagon. model 73637-585 made.73537-722 made.73535-151 made.73737-380 made.Correct me if I'm wrong Dave. Anyone else have some input?

These look like they are all for 1965. The only one I have contrary to those numbers is for 73737 - 371 & 397 for ex.

-- Edited by SD 396 at 19:28, 2008-11-12

beaumontguru · Canadian Poncho Superstar!

BEAUMONT production numbers

4SPEED427 · A Poncho Legend!

RE: beaumont body styles

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

68sd wrote:

1967

73169   1704 - i own it
73267    100 i think?
73517    3717?
73569     317   ????
73617    3452 confermed(no wonder everyone ownes one)gawd that is high!!!
73617 again could be 317
73867   everyone knows this 451 correct also had 251 w/35hp 396 L34

is the second last one supposed to be 73667?

Yes

beaumontwagon · Guru

This is great ,lets keep it rolling guys.

beaumontguru · Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Yup 13667, just a typo. Some of the numbers i was not sure of whether it was for the 6cyls or the 8 cyls.

beaumontguru · Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Carl Stevenson wrote:

Man, why can't you bet the Acadian guru???

There is next to nothing for figures for them.

Well if you insist:

65 canso SD HT V8 71837         274 correct
66 canso 71837                        552   144 w/L79
67 Invader V8 wagon                 100 produced
67 SD acadians                         370 but not sure if that is 6cyls or V8
66 or 67? invader 6cyl wagons    325 produced

68 Acadian SS 71427                 691 built (prod plant willow run Mi.
70 acadian SS 71427                1282 built also willow run
I had heard that all later acadians were built in the USA

And here is one just for you carl
67 nova SS 17377 6cyl        185 produced

NOTE HERE ARE A COUPLE CORRECTIONS THAT ARE VERIFIED
BEAUMONTS
1967    73667     408 cars NOT 317 as stated earlier
1965    73867     336 Cars   that is 65 SD V8 Rags confirmed(274 might be for the Custom 8cyl rags73667) possibly?????

AS FAR AS I KNOW THIS IS CORRECT INFO, most were from actual GM doc sheets, but there could be errors. I have corrected some of my figures over the years.

OK, im exhausted!!!!!

-- Edited by beaumontguru at 23:05, 2008-11-12

4SPEED427 · A Poncho Legend!

beaumontguru wrote:

Carl Stevenson wrote:

Man, why can't you bet the Acadian guru???

There is next to nothing for figures for them.

Well if you insist:
65 Canso SD HT 6 cyl 71737 672
65 canso SD HT V8 71837 274 correct
66 canso 71837 552 144 w/L79
67 Invader V8 wagon 100 produced
67 SD acadians 370 but not sure if that is 6cyls or V8
66 or 67? invader 6cyl wagons 325 produced

68 Acadian SS 71427 691 built (prod plant willow run Mi.
70 acadian SS 71427 1282 built also willow run
I had heard that all later acadians were built in the USA

And here is one just for you carl
67 nova SS 17377 6cyl 185 produced

NOTE HERE ARE A COUPLE CORRECTIONS THAT ARE VERIFIED
BEAUMONTS
1967 73667 408 cars NOT 317 as stated earlier
1965 73867 336 Cars that is 65 SD V8 Rags confirmed(274 might be for the Custom 8cyl rags73667) possibly?????

AS FAR AS I KNOW THIS IS CORRECT INFO, most were from actual GM doc sheets, but there could be errors. I have corrected some of my figures over the years.

OK, im exhausted!!!!!

-- Edited by beaumontguru at 23:05, 2008-11-12

I hope this works. I edited to add 65 Canso SD 6 cyl. I was told 672.

And I edited my "Why can't you be the Acadian guru" post to fix the typo.....

Thanks Dave

-- Edited by Carl Stevenson at 00:06, 2008-11-13

67rag396 · Poncho Master!

RE: beaumont/acadian/full size production #s

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

Hey guys. Can we move the full size info into the full size forums.
Thanks

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

68sd wrote:

if anyone knows how id like to move this to the library?

The easiest way is to do a copy of the post and paste it into the new one. I have done that before. It works great.

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

RE: beaumont/acadian production #s

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

68sd wrote:

what about steves ACADIAN beaumont? he will be lost in the middle

Steve will have to be special along with the other 62's and 63's and be in both.... I guess? There are 20 model / engine configurations for 62-63 Acadian Beaumont. Would it be better to keep just the Beaumont's here in this post? I am just trying to have the information posted where it can be found the easiest. I think the information is great.

4SPEED427 · A Poncho Legend!

RE: BEAUMONT production numbers

6T7SD396 · Veteran Member

Hi just a correction on the 1967 numbers: 73867 production is 66. I think you wanted to type the 73817 production as 451.

beaumontwagon · Guru

Just curious as to the production #s on this model, its 10 more than what we've gathered.Any thoughts

-- Edited by beaumontwagon at 16:31, 2008-11-15

beaumontguru · Canadian Poncho Superstar!

beaumontwagon wrote:

Just curious as to the production #s on this model, its 10 more than what we've gathered.Any thoughts

-- Edited by beaumontwagon at 16:31, 2008-11-15

You are probably right, this is an actual GM sheet to prove it.
Not sure where we had the 371 figure. I probably just heard it from someone or wrote it wrong.
Or, is there someone else with a diferent Figure on thier GM docs???????

Upon closer investigation, i did not provide that Figure. Who did??????

-- Edited by beaumontguru at 17:41, 2008-11-15

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

I suppose this is where we could have some issues and I must advise anyone looking at these numbers not to take them as gospel. I am glad that people are questioning the numbers here and are coming forth with something they feel is incorrect. You guys are the best.

I have quite a few of the VVS packages for the same model and have got contradicting information on some of them. I have had to call and fax information back to VVS to get them re-checked and sent back to me. If someone got paperwork for their car and that was the only one they had to go on they would believe it to be correct. Not that they are wrong in doing so but it does happen.
Please guys. If you see something that doesn't look correct speak up. It would be nice to have the data as correct as we can get it.

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

68sd wrote:

since were on topic ,can anyone tell me more about 69 sd figures,i hear 43,is that total ?or just 2 door hardtop?,i always wonder about the 69 sd 2 door sedans?

The GM docs for my 69 SD 350hp and paperwork from 3 other 69 SD 350hp cars all state: 43 of model 73437 and 73427 cars built with this engine. The 43 number includes all hardtops and post cars.
Does anyone have the number for 325hp cars built?

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

Good post Fred. This is a good example of how the numbers can end up being different. This post (red) was made and I replied (blue). The number from the paperwork posted shows 381. This is why I think it is important if anyone notices anything contrary to what they have that they speak up. I have gone through all of my figures and paperwork to be sure that I don't post anything unless I have the paperwork in front of me. Sorry for the confusion.

73737-380 made.
Anyone else have some input?

The only one I have contrary to those numbers is for 73737 - 371 & 397 for ex.

SD 396 · Poncho Master!

68sd wrote:

thats interesting,so there could be more with the lower horse engine,ive seen alot of beaumonts but ive never seen a 69sd

There were some made. slinky had a 325hp car. There is paperwork out there that several people have but the number produced is incorrect. I am trying to find someone with paperwork on more other than me.