Enjoy 5% OFF at VEVOR Canada! and Support Canadian Poncho at the Same Time!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: 65 - 70 B Body Suspension F40 vs F41


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7741
Date:
65 - 70 B Body Suspension F40 vs F41


I noticed this today with Hawker748 and 67Poncho posting their GM documention.  

Hawker748's lists    F41   Suspension:  Firm Ride and Handling, whereas,

67Poncho's lists       F40   Heavy Duty Front & Rear Suspension.

Can anyone tell me the difference?



__________________
70 2+2 convertible
70 2+2 hardtop
70 Parisienne hardtop

 

 



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Online
Posts: 49987
Date:

I think only F41 had the rear bar is the most obvious difference.


__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7741
Date:

Carl Stevenson wrote:

I think only F41 had the rear bar is the most obvious difference.


I figured F40 had the larger diameter front sway bar, and the F41 had the larger front sway bar, and the rear sway bar.   But that's just my theory.



__________________
70 2+2 convertible
70 2+2 hardtop
70 Parisienne hardtop

 

 



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Online
Posts: 49987
Date:

Wish we could prove that. Andrew (2qwik2c) and I spent some time in that yard last year I had told you about. There's a few of the big bars there and seems to be no pattern.

And closer to home, the 66 GP I bought last fall has F40 and has a small front bar. It's a head scratcher.

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Online
Posts: 49987
Date:

And to further confuse it, I've seen a big front bar on a 6 cyl car and a small front bar on a 396 car.

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1164
Date:

Springs and shocks were different from f40 to f41 aswell. I believe f41 cars had a lower ride height aswell. F40 was basically the station wagon suspension, in 67 f40 was not available on a wagon cause it already had it.

__________________

1967 2dr Biscayne. L36, M40, G80, K05, F41. #'s.
1967 Impala convert. 283, glide. Parked in the garage since 74 and hasn't moved. Soon to be BB 4speed.

 



Uber Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3463
Date:

F41 had frt and rear bars



__________________

 






Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4525
Date:

Carl Stevenson wrote:

Wish we could prove that. Andrew (2qwik2c) and I spent some time in that yard last year I had told you about. There's a few of the big bars there and seems to be no pattern.

And closer to home, the 66 GP I bought last fall has F40 and has a small front bar. It's a head scratcher.


I think the front sway bar on 65 and 66 cars was smaller than on 67 to 70 with or without F40. My understanding of the differecnes between F40 and F41 are: spring rates (F40 are stiffer - larger wire) than F41, plus F41 has the rear bar. That's how my 68 Caprice is outfitted.

I've seen several 6 cyl & small block V8 Chev and Cdn Pontiac cars from 67-70 with the F40 large front bar, but in every case, without exception, those cars had a 12 bolt rear end. I also had three Canadian 67-68 wagons with the big diameter springs, but they each only 10 bolt rear ends. That was wierd to me.  



__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4843
Date:

Carl Stevenson wrote:

And to further confuse it, I've seen a big front bar on a 6 cyl car and a small front bar on a 396 car.


 Hey how come your stealing my car for your avatar!?  It better still be at my place when I get home.

 



__________________

ken from northern Alberta

38 Willys pickup electric

39 Buick (327 with 700 r4)

66 Beaumont 4 door hardtop

69 Chevy CST pickup

1976 GMC 23'  motorhome

1994 Impala SS 

1968 Citroen Fourgonnette (Yeah Carl!)



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Online
Posts: 49987
Date:

'Fraid not Ken, don't hurry home!!!

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 107
Date:

Its actually interesting about the ride height when discussing F41 suspension.  When my Strato Chief came into the dealership in 1968 I hated the way it sat.  The front end was very low, compared to the rear, and the style on the street at that time, in Ontario, was that the front end should be higher than the rear.  I went to CTC and bought the spring expanders, (or whatever you would like to call them), and installed them in the front coils.  You would adjust the nut in the middle of the expander which would enlarge the space between the two coils you installed it in, thus lifting the front of the car.  A friend had a 68 Biscayne, also 427-385 hrs., with an F41, and he did the same thing.  In retrospect, the ride height being lower for an F41 suspension vehicle is absolutely correct, at least in my opinion, as I thought at the time it looked wrong.  By the way, even with me messing with the geometry of the front end by lifting it with those dumb CTC parts, the car at 120 plus miles per hour handled like a dream.  I know by todays standards this would be considered extremely dangerous but you must remember 45 years ago there were a lot less cars on the road and the risks were not as extreme as today.  Just as a matter of interest, I hope, when I ordered my car the heavy duty suspension was going to cost me $6.00, I think, and the special suspension (F41), cost me $24.00.



__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4525
Date:

That seems right about the ride height. My factory equipped F41 Caprice sits low relative to other non-F41 B bodies I own or have owned.



__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.