Enjoy 5% OFF at VEVOR Canada! and Support Canadian Poncho at the Same Time!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Gas Mileage dilema


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 597
Date:
Gas Mileage dilema


Cliff, you have all the numbers in your spreadsheet. Skip gas buddy, do the math yourself.

__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7707
Date:

I'm really missing something here on why there's all this confusion determining fuel mileage.

Step 1.   Ensure your odometer is properly calibrated (or determine the percentage error of your odometer).   Never mind your speedometer, just focus on your odometer.  On your car that will be in miles.  For us on the prairies it's quite simple to determine odometer calibration, as there's a grid road every mile going east / west, and every 2 miles going north / south.   The 66' that was set aside for the roads is part of the mile.

Step 2.  Keep track of your fuel purchases and mileage.   Your fuel purchases are in litres, there's 4.546 litres per Imperial Gallon.  Divide the number of litres by 4.546 to get fuel in imperial gallons.

Step 3.  Divide the number of miles driven (from your odometer) by the number of gallons used.

It's that simple. 



__________________
70 2+2 convertible
70 2+2 hardtop
70 Parisienne hardtop

 

 

Fall into savings UP TO C $50 OFF Shop now
Fall into savings UP TO C $50 OFF Shop now


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2249
Date:

I sent a note off to Gas Buddy and here is there reply 

It appears that I will have to do some calculations to get an accurate figure

 

It is interesting to note that they say the calculations are not entirely valid for Canada due to the size of the gallon and kph. 

 

Don (GasBuddy)

Oct 5, 12:59 PM CST

Hi Cliff,

Thanks for your email.

I'm sorry for any confusion I'm about to cause, this is typically a hard to answer from time to time as the units conversion can vary, depending on what website you're using, especially when it comes to the differences between modern and older Canadian vehicle converting to gallons.

This is because, and should go without saying, newer cars measure fuel economy in L/100 KM, older vehicles pre-metrification used MPH speedometers and miles on the odometers. Older cars were built with gallons in mind (because back in the day, gasoline was priced and purchased in gallons - in Canada specifically, the Imperial gallon was used).

The Fuel Logbook doesn't necessarily care about the size of the fuel tank, more so it looks for the amount of fuel used between complete fill ups (from empty to full is most recommended for the Logbook's use).

On a Canadian site, the units of measurement are in metric units, prices are input as c/L, and fuel economy can be measured in L/100 KM or MPG, odometer readings are input as KM. The question is whether this MPG is referring to US gallons or Imperial gallons, and to be honest, this isn't a frequent question, but I'm assuming that the MPG on a Canadian site uses an Imperial gallon. An Imperial gallon might do some auto-calculation with the provided KM odometer reading, but I can't say that for certain. The US sites allow for odometer readings to be input with miles, prices are input using $/Gal, but calculated fuel economy in MPG presumably with US Gallons. Canada doesn't do things in a similar fashion anymore, unfortunately.

The tricky part is a Canadian website shows the odometer readings as KM regardless of what fuel economy rating you jump back and forth between, which makes figuring out miles per gallon harder to calculate or be visually represented, when the distance being input is used as a KM and not miles. Have you tried converting the odometer readings to KM (if being input as miles), taking the L/100 KM fuel economy calculation and manually converting between US Gal and Imperial Gal?

I'm not sure if there is going to be an easy way to answer this, or if the fuel log can be helpful for your Impala. The last thing I want to say is you might need to do your own math, but, you might need to in order to get an accurate representation of your Impala's fuel economy, I don't think the Logbook will be 100% accurate for your use-case

PS - Would you happen to have a picture of your Impala? Younger generation with a shared passion, responding (I drive a newer Buick Regal "Gran Sport" ) - would love to see a picture!

Regards,

Don
GasBuddy.com

Photo sent...



__________________

Cliff

Done Hurryin

Like the larger type for my eyes. 

 

 



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 49872
Date:

Pretty cool last part of the reply.

Now we just need to educate him about Canadian Pontiacs too....

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2249
Date:

Ok, I spent some time playing with Excel. Its been a long time since I used it and the new version required another learning curve.

I hope the calculations are correct as it makes me feel much better......

 

Are my calculations Correct?

Hope so......

REVISION WITH JMONT64 CORRECTIONS 

 

CCI091016_0002.jpg

 



-- Edited by oshawacliff on Sunday 9th of October 2016 12:32:20 PM

Attachments
__________________

Cliff

Done Hurryin

Like the larger type for my eyes. 

 

 



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6749
Date:

Well if you are feeling good about it I really shouldn't say anything to take away that feeling. Think there is a problem though. Just a quick look and I think you have made a conversion away from your miles on your odometer to kilometres. That isn't necessary as all you have to do is convert your litres to gallons. Taken from the first chart you put up you will end up in the 16 to 18 mpg range which is more realistic. I think you will have to be going down hill all the way to average 24 with combined city and highway.

__________________
Jerel


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2249
Date:

Thanks I see my error
That is much better than what I was getting from the reading on Gas Buddy and I think I should be happy with 16-18

Thanks to all who pitched in on this issue for me.

I have a Edelbrock 1406 without the electric choke for sale... 200.00 Quick sale.

Cliff

__________________

Cliff

Done Hurryin

Like the larger type for my eyes. 

 

 

Fall into savings UP TO C $50 OFF Shop now
Fall into savings UP TO C $50 OFF Shop now


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7707
Date:

Here's what I get.  I'm not sure how you're calculating your average, but I suspect you've just added up the calculated MPG's and divided by 19.  Unfortunately that provides unfair weighting.

I took the total number of miles driven, divided by the total number of gallons consumed.  That's the true average.

Oshawa Cliff Mileage.jpg



Attachments
__________________
70 2+2 convertible
70 2+2 hardtop
70 Parisienne hardtop

 

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2249
Date:

I guess that is really the correct way

As you said I just added up the mileage and divided by 19

What a learning curve.
Blue Jays won!



__________________

Cliff

Done Hurryin

Like the larger type for my eyes. 

 

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2115
Date:

im now redoing carbs, everyone ive seen so far is set way to rich for the engine, that goes for holley, carter , or quads. ive managed to sqeeze a steady 14 out of my 406 and its a fulltime 4x4. the quads are a pain to set up because of all the drilling required but very reliable once set up .



__________________


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1848
Date:

I used your numbers and calculated mpg's and I get 12 to 18 miles per imperial gallon. Still much lower than I would expect.

Is your choke stuck? Once it's warmed up, take the air cleaner off and look into the carb. The choke plate should be fully open.

As mentioned, is the spark advance working? GM HEI distributors are well known for having the mechanical advance weights seize and not advance as RPM's come up.

Any indication you've got brakes dragging (hot to the touch after a drive with little braking)?

Is the inside of your exhaust pipe full of soot? A little is normal, but if it's building up, it's a good indication you're too rich.



__________________

_______________________________________
==|====|----B-E-A-U-M-O-N-T----|====|==

\__________________|________|____________________/

__\____O__________________|66BEAU|___________________O____/

«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.